The concept of a-legality by G. Lindahl: philosophical and legal foundations and prospects

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article examines the interpretation of legality from the point of view of the original approach developed by the Dutch and English scientist G. Lindahl. The ideas of legal positivism, phenomenology, and structural and functional analysis are based on the ideas of legality in line with this approach. The study reveals the nature, content, main positions and place of Lindahl’s concept of a-legality in modern legal thought. The main characteristics of the concepts of a-legality as a way of searching for “blind spots” are shown, in particular, in the context of the analysis of law and order and behavioral patterns based on the cognitive capabilities of sociology. The heuristic and cognitive potential of the arguments formulated by Lindahl on the possibility of distinguishing legality, illegality and a-legality is evaluated. Considerations are given regarding the philosophical and legal foundations and prospects for using the cognitive potential of the Lindahl system of legal representations. It is demonstrated that Lindahl’s concept of a-legality contains several levels of analysis of the problems of law and order – formal and genetic (normative). The agonistic theories of democracy are analyzed as a basis for constructing the key characteristics and meanings of the concept of a-legality. The limitations of the Lindahl concept are revealed.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Artyom Savenkov

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: artem.199417@yandex.ru

PhD in Law, Post-Doctoral Student

Ресей, 10, Znamenka St., Moscow, 119019

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Hegel G. V.F. Philosophy of Law / transl. from German; author intro., pp. 3–43, and note by V. S. Nersesyants. M., 1990 (in Russ.).
  2. Gorban V. S. The role of historiography in the Philosophy of Law and the formation of the conceptual language of modern legal theory // Antinomies. 2025. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 107–127 (in Russ.).
  3. Dvorkin R. On rights in earnest / transl. from English by M. D. Lahuti, L. B. Makeeva. M., 2004 (in Russ.).
  4. Pligin V. N. The problem of legitimacy in modern political and legal doctrines: abstract … Doctor of Law. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
  5. Savenkov A. N. Philosophy of Law and the formation of the Russian state-civilization. M., 2024 (in Russ.).
  6. Shapiro S. Legality / transl. from English; under the scientific ed. of A. Pavlov. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
  7. Chen B. The Principle of Legality: Protecting Statutory Rights from Statutory Infringement? (August 13, 2018). Sydney Law Review. 2019. 41(1). Pp. 73–104.
  8. Joseph P. The Principle of Legality: Constitutional Innovation // Meagher D. and Groves M. (eds). The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand. Federation Press, 2017. Pp. 31–42.
  9. Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre: mit einem Anhang: das Problem der Gerechtigkeit; unter Berücksichtigung von Kelsens Änderungen anlässlich der Übersetzung ins Italienische 1966 heraugegeben und eingeleitet von Matthias Jestaedt. Studienausgabe der 2. Auflage 1960. Tübingen, Wien, 2017.
  10. Lindahl H. Authority and the globalisation of inclusion and exclusion. Cambridge. New York, Port Melbourne, New Delhi, Singapore, 2018.
  11. Lindahl H. Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality. Oxford, 2013. Pp. 3, 4, 6, 36, 249, 250, 262, 263.
  12. Lindahl H. The opening: alegality political agonism. In: Law and agonistic politics. Farnham [u. a.]: Ashgate, 2009. Рp. 57–70.
  13. Meagher D. The Principle of Legality as Clear Statement Rule: Significance and Problems // Sydney Lav. Review. 2014. No. 36(3). Pp. 413–443.
  14. Mouffe Ch. Agonistik: die Welt politisch denken / aus dem Engl. von R. Barth. Berlin, 2014.
  15. Mouffe Ch. Eine grüne demokratische Revolution: Linkspopulismus und die Macht der Affekte / aus dem Englischen von U. Bischoff. Berlin, 2023.
  16. Valverde M. Chronotopes of law: jurisdiction, scale, and governance. New York, 2014.
  17. Wenman M. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge, 2013; Demokratietheorien: von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart: Texte und Interpretationshilfen / H. Buchstein, K. Pohl, R. Trimçev (Hg.). 10, vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Frankfurt am Main, 2021.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025