Convergence of the welfare of EU countries in the context of integration: hypothesis testing

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article analyses intercountry imbalances of socio-economic development in the European Union. The subject of the study is to check the validity of the hypothesis of convergence (rapprochment of levels) of development in the conditions of integration. Methods applied include graphical visualisation of data and statistical calculations using the compound interest formula transformed for the purpose of clarifying the hypothesis. The proposed method makes it possible to increase the predictive value of the study. The graph shows a stable gap between the catching-up countries and the average level of EU welfare (GDP per capita), with an insignificant reduction during periods of crisis. The number of years required for catching-up countries to pull up to the average level is calculated, taking into account the real growth rates of well-being in the period 2004-2022. The average convergence period exceeds 25 years, which proves its low probability. Most of the catching-up countries are unable to reach the average level of EU welfare in the foreseeable future, even with a hypothetical additional withdrawal of financial development assistance from the EU budget by an amount equivalent to one or two percent of national GDP per capita.

作者简介

Natalia Kondratieva

Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nkondratieva@inbox.ru
Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Бажан А.И. (2019) Экономический рост в ЕС и странах Вишеградской группы. Современная Европа. № 7(93). С. 72-81. doi: 10.15211/soveurope720197281.
  2. Буторина О.В. (2017) Экономическая интеграция и конвергенция. Европа XXI века. Новые вызовы и риски. Под ред. Ал.А. Громыко, В.П. Фёдорова. "Нестор-История", Москва. С. 25-42.
  3. Шишелина Л.Н. (ред.) (2017) Вишеградская четвёрка в Европейском союзе: дилеммы конвергенции. ИЕ РАН, Москва. 138 с.
  4. Глущенко К.П. (2012) Мифы о бета-конвергенции. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. Т. 4. № 16. С. 26-44.
  5. Кондратьева Н. Б. (2003) Сближение социально-экономического развития европейских стран в условиях интеграции - иллюзия или реальность? Экономическая наука современной России. № 1. С. 90-98.
  6. Цыркунов Д. (2010) Тенденции конвергенции и дивергенции в социально-экономическом развитии стран Центральной и Восточной Европы: эмпирический анализ. Журнал международного права и международных отношений. № 4. С. 87-94.
  7. Четыркин Е.М. (1995) Методы финансовых и коммерческих расчётов. Дело, Москва. 320 с.
  8. European Commission (2004) Catching-up, growth and convergence of the new Member States. European Economy. No. 4. P. 87-164.
  9. Konya I. (2023) Catching up or getting stuck: convergence in Eastern European economies. Eurasian Econ Rev. No. 13. P. 237-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00230-2
  10. Sala-i-Martin X.X. (1996) The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis. The Economic Journal. Vol. 106. No. 437. P. 1019-1036.
  11. WIIW (2002) Transition Countries Face Up to Global Stagnation: Is it Catching? Research Reports. No. 283. 106 p.
  12. Yin L., Zestos G.K., Michelis, L. (2003) Economic Convergence in the European Union. Journal of Economic Integration. No. 18(1). P. 188-213.
  13. Żuk P., Savelin L. (2018) Real convergence in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. ECB Economic Bulletin. Issue 3. P. 36-65.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023