Simulation and analysis of preliminary data of the experiment to study proton-proton correlations in the d + ¹H → p + p + n reaction

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The procedure for extracting the energy value of a virtual singlet proton-proton state from experimental data is considered. From a comparison of experimental data with simulation results, a preliminary value of Epp in the d + ¹H → p + p + n reaction at a deuteron energy of 15.3 MeV was obtained.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Kasparov

Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vyacheslav.mitsuk@phystech.edu
Ресей, Moscow, 117312

M. Mordovskoy

Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vyacheslav.mitsuk@phystech.edu
Ресей, Moscow, 117312

V. Mitsuk

Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: vyacheslav.mitsuk@phystech.edu
Ресей, Moscow, 117312

V. Lebedev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vyacheslav.mitsuk@phystech.edu
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

A. Spassky

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vyacheslav.mitsuk@phystech.edu
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Stoks V.G.J., Klomp R.A.M., Terheggen C.P.F. et al. // Phys. Rev. C. 1994. V. 49. No. 6. P. 2950.
  2. Haddok R.P., Salter R.M., Zeller Jr. M. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1965. V. 14. No. 9. P. 318.
  3. Salter R.M., Haddok R.P., Zeller M. et al. // Nucl. Phys. A. 1975. V. 254. P. 241.
  4. Baumer C., Frekers D., Grewe E.W. et al. // Phys. Rev. C. 2005. V. 71. No. 4. Art. No. 044003.
  5. Конобеевский Е.С., Зуев С.В., Мордовской М.В. и др. // Ядерн. физ. 2013. Т. 76. № 11. С. 1479; Konobeevski E.S., Zuyev S.V., Mordovskoy M.V. et al. // Phys. Atom. Nucl. 2013. V. 76. No. 11. P. 1398.
  6. Конобеевский Е.С., Зуев С.В., Каспаров A.A. и др. // Ядерн. физ. 2018. Т. 81. № 5. С. 555; Konobeevski E.S., Zuyev S.V., Kasparov A.A. et al. // Phys. Atom. Nucl. 2018. V. 81. No. 5. P. 595.
  7. Конобеевский Е.С., Афонин А.А., Зуев С.В. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2020. Т. 84. № 4. С. 492; Konobeevski E.S., Afonin A.A., Zuyev S.V. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2020. V. 84. No. 4. P. 378.
  8. Robson D. // Nucl. Phys A. 1973. V. 204. No. 3. P. 523.
  9. Конобеевский Е.С., Афонин А.А., Каспаров А.А. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2021. Т. 85. № 5. С. 685; Konobeevski E.S., Afonin A.A., Kasparov A.A. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2021. V. 85. No. 5. P. 530.
  10. Зуев С.В., Конобеевский Е.С., Мордовской М.В. и др. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2013. Т. 77. № 7. С. 919; Zuyev S.V., Konobeevski E.S., Mordovskoy M.V. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2013. V. 77. No. 7. P. 834.
  11. Ying-ji Z., Jin-qing Y., Jie Z. et al. // Phys. Rev. C. 1992. V. 45. No. 2. P. 528.
  12. Bergervoet J.R., van Campen P.C., van der Sanden W.A. et al. // Phys. Rev. C. 1988. V. 38. No. 1. P. 15.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup designed based on the results of kinematic modeling: 1 – vacuum scattering chamber (Æ23 cm), 2 – CH2 target, 3 – neutron detector based on liquid scintillator EJ301, 4 – silicon ΔE-detector (25 μm), 5 – silicon E-detector (1000 μm), 6 – system including preamplifier and/or amplifier, 7 – shaper with tracking threshold, 8 – time-amplitude converter.

Жүктеу (81KB)
3. Fig. 2. ΔE-E diagrams reflecting the experimental results before (a) and after preliminary processing of the experimental data (b). The regions correspond to charged particles formed in the reactions: 1 – protons in d + p → p + d; 2 – deuterons in d + 12C → d + 12C (g.s.); 3 – deuterons in d + p → d + p, 4 – protons in d + 12C → p + 13C.

Жүктеу (342KB)
4. Fig. 3. Experimental spectra: reconstructed experimental spectrum of proton energy before (solid black line) and after (gray dotted line) selection by mass and emission angle of the second charged particle (a); similar reconstructed experimental spectrum of the energy of an undetected particle (b). Spectra after selection are plotted along the auxiliary Y axis.

Жүктеу (60KB)
5. Fig. 4. Comparison of the obtained preliminary experimental spectrum of protons (dots) with the simulated spectra selected at Epp ± Γ = 100 ± 10 (dashed line), 400 ± 90 (solid line), 600 ± 120 keV (dotted line).

Жүктеу (59KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024